LCORE-390: field description for ReadinessResponse model#537
Conversation
WalkthroughAdded descriptive metadata and examples to ReadinessResponse across OpenAPI JSON, Markdown docs, and the Pydantic model by wrapping fields with Field. No structural or semantic API changes; only documentation-oriented updates. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/models/responses.py (1)
176-192: Tiny wording nits for clarity/consistencyConsider tightening phrasing.
- ready: bool = Field( - ..., - description="Flag indicating if service is ready", - examples=[True, False], - ) + ready: bool = Field( + ..., + description="Flag indicating whether the service is ready", + examples=[True, False], + ) - reason: str = Field( - ..., - description="The reason for the readiness", - examples=["Service is ready"], - ) + reason: str = Field( + ..., + description="Reason for the readiness status", + examples=["Service is ready"], + ) - providers: list[ProviderHealthStatus] = Field( - ..., - description="List of unhealthy providers in case of readiness failure.", - examples=[], - ) + providers: list[ProviderHealthStatus] = Field( + ..., + description="List of unhealthy providers when not ready; empty when ready.", + examples=[], + )docs/openapi.md (1)
757-757: Unrelated example tweak—confirm or revertThis change to a FeedbackRequest example seems out of scope for LCORE-390. If unintentional, please revert to keep the PR focused.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/openapi.json(1 hunks)docs/openapi.md(2 hunks)docs/output.md(1 hunks)src/models/responses.py(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: e2e_tests
- GitHub Check: build-pr
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/models/responses.py (1)
176-192: LGTM on Field metadata for ReadinessResponseDescriptions and examples are aligned and will improve the generated schema/docs.
docs/output.md (1)
1117-1119: Docs match model changesReadinessResponse field descriptions are consistent with the Pydantic model.
docs/openapi.md (1)
1127-1129: Docs match model changesReadinessResponse field descriptions align with the code and OpenAPI JSON.
docs/openapi.json (1)
2243-2265: Schema metadata addition looks goodAdded title/description/examples for ReadinessResponse properties improves API clarity without changing the contract.
1 participant
Description
LCORE-390: field description for ReadinessResponse model
Type of change
Related Tickets & Documents
Summary by CodeRabbit